plant journal外审一般3-6个月左右。无论是plant journal期刊还是其他类别的期刊，外审都是最耗时的一个环节，期刊的审稿周期中可以说外审占比是非常高的，外审时间长短很大程度上取决于外审专家的工作效率，由于外审专家本身是一些专业内的专家学者或者大学教授，本身工作就比较繁忙，审稿只能是利于空余时间完成，所以大致的时间在3-6个月左右不等。简介：Plant Science Journal创刊于1983年，为科学出版社出版的植物学综合性学术期刊，国内外公开发行。本刊宗旨是促进学术交流，推动学科发展，为国民经济建设服务。主要任务是报道植物学及各分支学科的基础研究和应用研究方面具创新性、有重要意义的原始研究论文和最新研究成果，植物学研究的新技术、新方法等。本刊主要刊载植物学及各分支学科的原始研究论文，植物学研究的新技术、新方法，综合评述（应结合作者本人的研究工作、反映本学科在国内外的最新研究进展）、研究简报、学术讨论、重要书刊评介和学术动态等。
举例一： 论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒） 所 投杂志：Life Sciences 投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 编辑信内容（注： 有删节）： Dear M XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified refereeM We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the J Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new To submit a revision, go to and log in as an A You will see a menu item called Submission Needing R You will find your submission record Yours sincerely, Joseph J Bahl, PhD Editor Life Sciences Format Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your Pay particular attention to our References Reviewers" comments: Reviewer #1: XXXXX （略） Reviewer #2: XXXXX （略） Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议） Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>> Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of From the similarity of the serum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Introduction: some sentences can be made less example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997) These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and >>>The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid) >>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003)and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) >>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion >>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD >>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at du Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences 作 者回复信原稿： Dear D Bahl, I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作） Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当） Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后） Reviewer #1: XXXXX Reviewer #2: XXXXX Editors note and suggestions: Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English Answer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误） Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误） The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体） Introduction: some sentences can be made less Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺） The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors Answer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可） I have carefully corrected The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003) and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) Answer: I changed the style of Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答） reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Answer: Thank you for your I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2) I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可） Your comments and suggestions really helped me a I have put great efforts to this I wish it can be If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact Thank you again for your time and Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from Yours Sincerely Xxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)
把不重要的图放在补充材料里。或者是把一个个小图合并成不超过一整页的大图版。
没有the plant journal 的杂志，只有plant journal 的杂志，是SCI2区的影响因子946
plant journal外审一般3-6个月左右。无论是plant journal期刊还是其他类别的期刊，外审都是最耗时的一个环节，期刊的审稿周期中可以说外审占比是非常高的，外审时间长短很大程度上取决于外审专家的工作效率，由于外审专家本身是一些专业内的专家学者或者大学教授，本身工作就比较繁忙，审稿只能是利于空余时间完成，所以大致的时间在3-6个月左右不等。简介：Plant Science Journal创刊于1983年，为科学出版社出版的植物学综合性学术期刊，国内外公开发行。本刊宗旨是促进学术交流，推动学科发展，为国民经济建设服务。主要任务是报道植物学及各分支学科的基础研究和应用研究方面具创新性、有重要意义的原始研究论文和最新研究成果，植物学研究的新技术、新方法等。本刊主要刊载植物学及各分支学科的原始研究论文，植物学研究的新技术、新方法，综合评述（应结合作者本人的研究工作、反映本学科在国内外的最新研究进展）、研究简报、学术讨论、重要书刊评介和学术动态等。
一、稿件要求选题新颖，观点正确。字数以3700-6200字为宜。来稿以word 格式。二、稿件需有150字左右的论文摘要，摘要主要摘出文稿的主要观点，突出文稿中最重要、最富有新意的闪光点。切忌使用解释性、介绍性、评价性的语言。三、需有作者简介。内容包括：姓名、出生年、性别、籍贯、职称、学位、研究方向、署名单位邮编和联系方式等。四、提供3-6个关键词，关键词是反映文章最主要内容的术语，是用来描述文献资料的主题和用来检索文献资料进行搜集的标准化词汇。选词以最能迅速、准确地搜索到该篇论文为原则，如人名、作品、术语、核心词汇等。五、来稿中的注释与参考文献分别排列。注释是对文章篇名、作者及正文中某一特定内容的进一步解释或补充说明，排在该页下脚，序号用数字加圆圈标注。参考文献是作者写作论文是所参考的图书报刊等资料的引文。六、来稿一律不退，请作者自留底稿。从收稿之日起3个月内，未接到采用通知，作者可自行处理。
如果你时间富裕稿件质量也是很高可以直接发到社里，
比较流行用CSSCI的来源刊，可以找CSSCI的目录
你可以百度一下 OK数据网 上面的资料，也许对你有帮助
没有
我就是太原的 经常去柳巷 也不是经常能看见啊
你可以搞份甲方乙方，那上面资料不较全
plant journal是 植物杂志/植物学报；plant physiology是 植物生理学 PP（plant physiology）是老牌的杂志了，曾一度引领植物研究，后来，上世纪90年代末开办的Plant Cell成了植物的老大。PP一直和plant Journal (P J)不相上下，略有逊色，但现在IF一度超过PJ。但PP有特色，PC和PJ都注重分子生物学，PP可以说兼容并蓄。一直是光合作用研究的阵地。可以说，都很难，好不好中，看你的研究方向更适合哪个期刊。 两期刊审稿首先是一个领域主编和一个副编先看一遍，一般一周左右，两人意见一致，再送审，一般两个审稿人，给审稿人的时间一般三周左右，所以周期一般很快的。 一个月左右，文章接受后，几天后就直接在线刊出。期刊名 plant physiology 出版周期: 月刊 中科院杂志分区 植物科学分类下的 1 区期刊植物领域的顶级期刊近四年影响因子：2013年度 2012年度 2011年度 2010年度 394 555 535 451 期刊名 plant journal 出版周期: 半月刊 中科院杂志分区 植物科学分类下的 1 区期刊 同样是植物领域顶级期刊近四年影响因子：2013年度 2012年度 2011年度 2010年度 815 582 16 948
平均1个月的审稿周期我也贡献投稿命中率投稿平均命中率为 ：75%我也贡献近四年影响因子2014年度2013年度2012年度2011年度791杂志很好，但审稿周期长，3个月到5/6个月不等的都有，若着急毕业的话需慎重考虑，不着急的话是个不错的选择。望能帮到您！
审稿时间:约3个月 很好的期刊。研究的东西一定要新颖，而且有功能全面。