举例一： 论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒） 所 投杂志：Life Sciences 投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 编辑信内容（注： 有删节）： Dear M XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified refereeM We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the J Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new To submit a revision, go to and log in as an A You will see a menu item called Submission Needing R You will find your submission record Yours sincerely, Joseph J Bahl, PhD Editor Life Sciences Format Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your Pay particular attention to our References Reviewers" comments: Reviewer #1: XXXXX （略） Reviewer #2: XXXXX （略） Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议） Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>> Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of From the similarity of the serum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Introduction: some sentences can be made less example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997) These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and >>>The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid) >>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003)and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) >>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion >>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD >>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at du Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences 作 者回复信原稿： Dear D Bahl, I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作） Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当） Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后） Reviewer #1: XXXXX Reviewer #2: XXXXX Editors note and suggestions: Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English Answer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误） Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误） The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体） Introduction: some sentences can be made less Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺） The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors Answer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可） I have carefully corrected The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003) and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) Answer: I changed the style of Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答） reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Answer: Thank you for your I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2) I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可） Your comments and suggestions really helped me a I have put great efforts to this I wish it can be If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact Thank you again for your time and Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from Yours Sincerely Xxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)
为后面来看这个问题的同学划重点。information for authors 里有。一旦提交，初始格式检查后不久，手稿的状态将显示为“审核中”。所以不是送审了，也有可能是编辑还在看你这个文章适不适合发表。具体上面还有一段：所有提交材料最初都由编辑部的科学编辑在必要时与编委会成员协商进行评估。 在初始评估后被认为不适合在分子植物中发表的作品将在没有外部评论的情况下返回给作者，通常在7个工作日内提交，以便在其他地方提交作品不会被延迟。 选择用于外部评论的手稿通常由两个或三个评论者针对每个手稿进行评估。 编辑将尽一切努力确保及时审核，并通常在收到稿件的4周内作出编辑决定。
MP只有under review一个状态。只要投稿状态就是under review这个状态。耐心等待就行。
plant journal是 植物杂志/植物学报；plant physiology是 植物生理学 PP（plant physiology）是老牌的杂志了，曾一度引领植物研究，后来，上世纪90年代末开办的Plant Cell成了植物的老大。PP一直和plant Journal (P J)不相上下，略有逊色，但现在IF一度超过PJ。但PP有特色，PC和PJ都注重分子生物学，PP可以说兼容并蓄。一直是光合作用研究的阵地。可以说，都很难，好不好中，看你的研究方向更适合哪个期刊。 两期刊审稿首先是一个领域主编和一个副编先看一遍，一般一周左右，两人意见一致，再送审，一般两个审稿人，给审稿人的时间一般三周左右，所以周期一般很快的。 一个月左右，文章接受后，几天后就直接在线刊出。期刊名 plant physiology 出版周期: 月刊 中科院杂志分区 植物科学分类下的 1 区期刊植物领域的顶级期刊近四年影响因子：2013年度 2012年度 2011年度 2010年度 394 555 535 451 期刊名 plant journal 出版周期: 半月刊 中科院杂志分区 植物科学分类下的 1 区期刊 同样是植物领域顶级期刊近四年影响因子：2013年度 2012年度 2011年度 2010年度 815 582 16 948
平均1个月的审稿周期我也贡献投稿命中率投稿平均命中率为 ：75%我也贡献近四年影响因子2014年度2013年度2012年度2011年度791杂志很好，但审稿周期长，3个月到5/6个月不等的都有，若着急毕业的话需慎重考虑，不着急的话是个不错的选择。望能帮到您！
审稿时间:约3个月 很好的期刊。研究的东西一定要新颖，而且有功能全面。
投的是哪个刊物啊？可能性跟你刚投时是一样的，一般论文会经过两轮审核，一审和复审，两轮审完就会给你意见了。如果给你的意见是让你修改，你就按照要求修改，这个时候基本你的论文已经录用了。但是修改完你还要经过编辑对格式的审核，编辑一般都不会刷了，只是对你论文发表的时间进行调整。如果你的论文主题和最近投入该杂志社的论文主题大多类似，你的论文发表时间可能会延后，当然如果你写的很好，也可能提前。同样你的论文主题比较新颖，同样也可以提前发表。
有两种可能。一种可能是，送两个外审专家，其中一个外审审稿超过时间都没有回复评审意见，所以又找了第三个专家审稿；另一种可能是两个外审专家审稿意见都回来了，但是两个专家的意见相反，编辑部不能下定论，还需要找第三位专家评审，由第三位专家的意见来定夺你的文章情况。
这是正常的，论文发表审核过程本就有多个步骤，只是根据刊物的不同可能会省一些步骤。发表论文外审后进行复审什么意思?外审和复审都是期刊审稿的主要环节，一般期刊正常的审稿流程是初审、外审、复审，初审通常由杂志社编辑完成，外审也叫专家审，是由外部专家学者完成的，复审就是主编终审，期刊审稿流程对于大多数期刊来说都是基本一致的，只不过时间长短有所不同。相关拓展投稿，是作者将自己享有著作权的某一未发表作品投寄给媒体、报刊杂志社、广播电视台或出版社并希望被采用的行为。投稿，是作者将自己享有著作权的某一未发表作品投寄给报刊杂志社、广播电视台或出版社并希望被采用的行为。从作者与媒体出版部门之间就因投稿形成了合同法律关系，投稿无疑是形成这一关系的前置环节。从合同法角度看，投稿这一民事行为应属于“要约邀请”而非“要约”。 最终的法律关系形成，还需满足有投稿→愿接受→遵守事先公约。以上内容参考 百度百科-投稿
复审就是重新审稿，我之前在心理学进展上投稿，就经历了一次复审，原因是第一次没有录用，需要根据审稿意见修改稿件，修改好后发给编辑就安排复审了
审稿完差不多就能出版Scientific reports一般给审稿人一周的审稿期限。1、审稿给的时间是一周，过了一周以后就每周都来信催，最迟差不多一个月审完。2、Scientific Reports 是 Natrure 旗下的综合性科学期刊，2012年第一次影响因子为9。文章强调技术上的先进，但无需具有重大科研意义，所以审稿要求低于Nature的其他刊物。3、投稿者一般都是投Nature系列刊物被拒稿后转投的，所以文章水平还是比较高的。4、由于是新刊物，且发表文章数量过多，因此造成影响因子偏低。5、该期刊目前在国内物理界还是受到广泛认可的，但是唯影响因子论的老板或单位就看不上了。6、期刊审稿时间在1个月左右，其审稿难度远高于同影响因子的期刊。
作者指南中如下所述: Invalid file format for this File T Either change the File Type or use the "Replace Files" tab to upload a replace file in the correct Valid file formats for this File Type include: Tab Separated (tds), Comma Separated (csv) The file type for this manuscript file is not We accept manuscript files in Word (doc), Text(txt), Word (docx), Latex (tex) 可以把表格放在文章的最后就可以了 如果提示:可是upload filed 总是显示There may still be some incomplete Not yet completed。我投稿后，编辑又把文章打回来。让我完成所有步骤再投。 则需要再次检查投稿过程中的每一部分，需要点击鼠标选择的部分也不要漏掉才可以。
这种期刊的投稿状态在哪里看，可以在他的期刊的主页面上，或者说个人页面上来进行观看。
SCI论文审稿流程及状态解读对于初次投稿的作者，审稿流程以及审稿状态是其主要关注的，了解审稿流程，不仅可以掌握自己稿件的随时状态，以及状态背后所隐藏的信息，进而做到心中有数，今天为大家分享一篇SCI论文审稿流程的详细介绍。参与审稿的人：（1）Editor in Chief（EIC），主编，对稿件有最终决定权。（2）ADM- (可能是) Administrator，协助主编日常工作。（3）Associated Editor（AE） 副编辑，其会在审稿人（reviewers）意见的基础上对文章作个综合评价后，给主编一个recommendation。一般主编都会按照AE的意见写最终的decision letter。（4）Reviewer--审稿人，对你的文章进行审稿，并将审稿意见提交给AE。Article submitted后（即论文提交后）：1、awaiting procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。一般会要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。但是审稿人觉得时间不够，可以写信给主编要求延长审稿期限。这个时间长短要取决于审稿人是否有空看你的文章，还要看他是否守时。一般三周左右。4、awaiting AE assignment 等待AE的指派。编辑部在选择/联系AE。一般1－3天左右。5、awaiting AE recommendation 等待AE的推荐。 有些杂志要求AE三周内给结果。基本都是期限的最后一两天才给结果。6、awaiting EIC decision －激动人心的时刻。 等待主编的决定。一般3－4天。EIC的最终决定也分以下几种情况：1－Accept2－accept after minor revision(withour re-review不需要再送审)3－reconsideration after major (要再送审，即要再经过审稿流程3－6)4－reject and resubmit (论文现在状态不能接受，但可以修改后重新再投。要重新经过审稿流程1－6)5－reject （没有希望了，尽快改投其它期刊)很多作者在投稿后，对自己论文的后续审稿状态不是很了解，心里一直坎坷不安，其实，熟悉审稿流程及各状态情况，可以消除您的不安，也在出现不希望看到的结果后，能及时转变投稿方向，这对于作者是非常必要的。参考：查尔斯沃思论文润色网页链接
表示编辑将你的稿件再度送审了，这是修稿后经常发生的事。如果审稿人的意见不够好，或是意见相左，审稿人有可能无法根据审稿意见做出决定，那么就有可能追加审稿。《科学引文索引》简称 SCI ，美国科学信息研究所（ ISI）的尤金·加菲尔德于1957 年在美国费城创办的引文数据库。SCI（科学引文索引）、EI（工程索引）、ISTP（科技会议录索引）是世界著名的三大科技文献检索系统，是国际公认的进行科学统计与科学评价的主要检索工具。影响1、科学引文索引以布拉德福(S C Bradford)文献离散律理论、以加菲尔德(E Garfield)引文分析理论为主要基础，通过论文的被引用频次等的统计，对学术期刊和科研成果进行多方位的评价研究，从而评判一个国家或地区、科研单位、个人的科研产出绩效，来反映其在国际上的学术水平。2、科学引文索引以其独特的引证途径和综合全面的科学数据，通过统计大量的引文，然后得出某期刊某论文在某学科内的影响因子、被引频次、即时指数等量化指标来对期刊、论文等进行排行。3、被引频次高，说明该论文在它所研究的领域里产生了巨大的影响，被国际同行重视，学术水平高。由于SCI收录的论文主要是自然科学的基础研究领域，所以SCI指标主要适用于评价基础研究的成果，而基础研究的主要成果的表现形式是学术论文。4、科学引文索引是当今世界上最著名的检索性刊物之一 ，也是文献计量学和科学计量学的重要工具。通过引文检索功能可查找相关研究课题早期、当时和最近的学术文献，同时获取论文摘要；可以看到所引用参考文献的记录、被引用情况及相关文献的记录。