被science拒稿再投

首先投稿之后1天内会确认收到你的稿件。science,nature,cell这些每周收大概200+份投稿。首先编辑们会大规模筛一些乍一看就不靠谱的稿，然后剩下的会上editorialboard给头头们看看继续筛，这个过程加起来大概筛大概80%。这里的不靠谱指的是没达到顶级期刊的的水平，可能本身质量不错甚至很好但专业性太强不太适合science和nature这种综合性期刊。如果在这个阶段被拒的话一般几天内就会收到拒信，长的话2个礼拜内也肯定会通知。筛完80%之后编辑们会把稿子发给各行专家review，也就是所谓的peer-review阶段，每篇稿子大概会有两个reviewer。他们会在两周内提交意见给editorialboard。然后board会大概在20%里面再筛三分之二。期间可能他们会简单编辑一下然后还给你继续改。另外筛稿的标准一般不是文章的绝对质量，而是看跟同时跟你一起投的200多个人比的相对质量。换句话说就是看人品

要么提升质量，修改后重提交，要么找个低档次的吧，这还能有什么投机取巧的方法？ journal of membrane science这个杂志审稿周期为1个月。结果呢一个编辑审稿1个月后告诉我要我加一个数据，然后feel free to resubmit the 11月底的时候我就submit了文章，12月8号under review，大概1月26号的时候编辑说要我再继续推荐3个审稿人，我又推荐了3个，大概3月16号收到来信，如下：I have made numerous attempts to obtain a another review from a secondreferee, including sending multiple reminder Unfortunately, I haveonly one To prevent undue delay for you, I have decided to proceedbased on one A Reviewers has now commented on your paper and comments are appended You will see that the referee is advising that you revise your The referee comments that the manuscript could reasonably be shortened, andthat the advantages of your system should be framed with respect to Some of the SEMs could also be included in the SupplementaryI Please consider the comments and suggestions carefully andincorporate the appropriate changes into your revised If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or arebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit therevised In order to determine the extent of your revision andfacilitate the re-review process should it be necessary, please provide adetailed point-by-point response and a clear indication of where changeswere made to the original manuscript, by indicating all changes with 说明编辑对你的文章蛮感兴趣，也比较负责，还是按照他的意见，积极做吧，很有希望你这个文章，让你修稿，接收的几率很大。条件是：你必须按照审稿人的意见修稿，半点不能马虎。写回复信的时候，一定要客气。祝你好运