plant journal外审一般3-6个月左右。无论是plant journal期刊还是其他类别的期刊，外审都是最耗时的一个环节，期刊的审稿周期中可以说外审占比是非常高的，外审时间长短很大程度上取决于外审专家的工作效率，由于外审专家本身是一些专业内的专家学者或者大学教授，本身工作就比较繁忙，审稿只能是利于空余时间完成，所以大致的时间在3-6个月左右不等。简介：Plant Science Journal创刊于1983年，为科学出版社出版的植物学综合性学术期刊，国内外公开发行。本刊宗旨是促进学术交流，推动学科发展，为国民经济建设服务。主要任务是报道植物学及各分支学科的基础研究和应用研究方面具创新性、有重要意义的原始研究论文和最新研究成果，植物学研究的新技术、新方法等。本刊主要刊载植物学及各分支学科的原始研究论文，植物学研究的新技术、新方法，综合评述（应结合作者本人的研究工作、反映本学科在国内外的最新研究进展）、研究简报、学术讨论、重要书刊评介和学术动态等。
举例一： 论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒） 所 投杂志：Life Sciences 投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 编辑信内容（注： 有删节）： Dear M XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified refereeM We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the J Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new To submit a revision, go to and log in as an A You will see a menu item called Submission Needing R You will find your submission record Yours sincerely, Joseph J Bahl, PhD Editor Life Sciences Format Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your Pay particular attention to our References Reviewers" comments: Reviewer #1: XXXXX （略） Reviewer #2: XXXXX （略） Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议） Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>> Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of From the similarity of the serum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Introduction: some sentences can be made less example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997) These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and >>>The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid) >>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003)and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) >>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion >>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD >>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at du Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences 作 者回复信原稿： Dear D Bahl, I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作） Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当） Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后） Reviewer #1: XXXXX Reviewer #2: XXXXX Editors note and suggestions: Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English Answer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误） Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误） The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体） Introduction: some sentences can be made less Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺） The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors Answer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可） I have carefully corrected The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003) and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) Answer: I changed the style of Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答） reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Answer: Thank you for your I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2) I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可） Your comments and suggestions really helped me a I have put great efforts to this I wish it can be If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact Thank you again for your time and Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from Yours Sincerely Xxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)
三个月之内都算正常的。一般期刊给审稿人的审稿时间会是3个月、60天，快的也会是30天，不同期刊要求不一样，你总得给点时间人家审稿人吧？:D人家也不是专业审稿的，还有很多科研工作甚至行政工作要做啊，呵呵！只要是under review就好，安心等待吧！
登录官网进行查看。Plantdisease是个SCI权威期刊，即二区期刊。PlantDisease是美国植物病理学会APS主办的专业学术期刊，内容偏应用一些，大概2至3分左右，在植物病理学领域算是不错的期刊。该期刊最大的特色是每期都刊登大量的病害通告“DiseaseNote”，这类病害通告对于我们即时了解新病害有很大帮助，但并非是“OriginalResearchArticle”，不是严格意义上的研究性文章。病害通告的篇幅一般一页纸，内容比较固定。比如何时何地何种作物上发现某种新病害，病症描述，分离病原等。
Plant Disease是植物病理学权威期刊,审稿专家特别认真,对文章内容进行了逐 plant disease 一直是top期刊,也是有他的道理的。
作为一个科学家，谁不愿意在自己的简历中添上一两篇NATURE或SCIENCE的文章？ 任何一位有着雄心壮志的科学家，谁不希望自己的研究小组能够每年发表一两篇 NATURE或SCIENCE的文章？可有任何一个博士后，一位从事实验研究的博士后， 未曾梦想过自己。
-nature的期刊一般应该很快会给出送审或者拒稿的信，1周左右就会有第一次结果，编辑有直接拒稿的权利，但这个拒稿大多数是技术审查或者创新性不足，不足以吸引编辑的眼球。提醒一下nature physics的审稿第一，在系统里面直接看不到稿件的状态，这个需要从编辑发送到投稿人的邮件里去看。第二，稿件送审不一定有邮件通知。第三，每一次编辑作出决定以后，系统都由live manuscript变到Post Decision Manuscripts (1)，在没有收到邮件之前，你并不一定知道是好消息还是坏消息（之前一直以为只要没有被拒，就会一直是live manuscript，拒了，才会是Post Decision Manuscripts）。每次上传完最新的稿件后，状态又会是从Post Decision Manuscripts变到live manuscript。进入下一循环的Manuscript under submission - Manuscript received - Editor assigned - Manuscript under consideration - Decision sent to author。
一般一个月之内，上次我的大修，我修到一个月的时候编辑准时来信催了，问是不是没有接收到她的要求修改文章的电子邮件？后来申请延后了几天，也顺利接收了，感觉RSC的编辑都很nice和人性化，有不明白的随时可以跟他们沟通。
朋友，直接往要投的报刊的电子邮箱投稿即可。根据我多年从事文字工作的经验，我认为：如果投稿更有针对性，命中率会更高一些。这就关系到，你是哪里的？干什么的？写的稿件是什么体裁？什么内容？如果说投稿的话，最好投当地的报刊、网络或者是你从事的职业报刊发表，要投哪个媒体首先要研究哪个媒体，看它需要什么内容、什么体裁、什么格式的稿件，“对症下”，这样会更轻松一些、方便一些，命中率会更高一些。如果你能够告诉我你的具体情况（干什么工作，哪里的，写的小说的大致内容等），我可以给你一些建议。我1993年开始在部队时开始发表各类文章，包括：报告文学、新闻、诗歌、散文、小说、评论等体裁的，到目前，先后在《人民日报》《法制日报》《农民日报》《中国文化报》《法制文萃》《半月谈》《解放军报》《中国国防报》《中国绿色时报》《中国日报》《中国教育报》《人民公安报》《中国交通报》《中国安全生产报》《中国转业军官》《中国人事》《道路交通管理》等报刊发表的大约5000篇左右吧，有40多篇获奖。另外：投稿时，第一要有信心，第二要投对报刊媒体，这两点非常重要。祝你成功！
HNO HERZ IRBM B-ENT CUTIS PFLEGECHIRURGIN VIVOIN VIVOJBR-BTR NOTARZT给你一些四区的IF<1的医学SCI期刊，你自己琢磨下
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL《中华医学杂志》(英文版) 月刊 ISSN:0366-6999 影响因子393 CELL RESEARCH《细胞研究》(英文版) 双月刊 1001-0602 729中西医结合杂志(英文版)中医杂志(英文版)中国药理学杂志
这个期刊投稿平均命中率为 ：5% 当文章有一定深度，还是易中的。期刊名 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research 出版周期: 季刊 审稿速度 平均5个月的审稿周期 近四年影响因子 2014年度 2013年度 2012年度 2011年度 935 932 448 182
清洁产环境态类杂志影响8左右-