教育类的也不少，《成人教育》《中国成人教育》《职教论坛》《教育与职业》这些比较常见的。
思想理论教育导刊 也是权威啊，cssci！
1、《马克思主义哲学》（选择比较有权威性的；最好是教育部组织编写的）； 2、《马克思主义政治经济学》（选择比较有权威性的；最好是教育部组织编写的）； 3、《中国化的马克思主义概论》又叫《毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想思想概论》（选择比较有权威性的；最好是教育部组织编写的）； 4、《科学社会主义理论与实践》（选择比较有权威性的）； 5、《思想政治教育学》（选择比较有权威性的；最好是教育部组织编写的）； 6、《中国共产党思想政治教育史》（选择比较有权威的）； 7、《马克思主义发展史》（选择比较有权威性的）； 8、《中国共产党历史》（选择比较有权威性的）； 9、《马克思主义原著选读》（选择比较有权威性的)思想政治教育学原理》 邱伟光 张耀灿 主编 高等教育出版社 《思想政治教育方法论》 郑永廷 主编 高等教育出版社 《中国共产党思想政治工作史论》 张耀灿 主编 高等教育出版社 《马克思主义思想政治教育理论基础》 罗国杰 主编 高等教育出版社 《政治观教育通论》 王玄武 主编 高等教育出版社 《道德观通论》 宋希仁 主编 高等教育出版社 《人生观通论》 张孝宜 主编 高等教育出版社 《唯物史观通论》 林泰 主编 高等教育出版社 《马克思主义思想政治教育著作导读》 刘德华 主编 高等教育出版社 《现代西方意识形态导论》 车铭洲 主编 高等教育出版社 《思想政治教育案例分析》 戴艳军 主编 高等教育出版社 《比较思想政治教育学》 王瑞荪 主编 高等教育出版社 《思想政治教育学原理》 张耀灿 陈万柏 主编 高等教育出版社《思想政治教育方法论》 教育部社会科学研究与思想政治工作司 组编 高等教育出版社 《德育忧思》 华文出版社 陈会昌 著 《人生理论与实践》 北京大学出版社 沈继英 祖嘉合 主编 《人生观通论》 教育部社会科学研究与思想政治工作司 组编 高等教育出版社 《公民道德建设实施纲要学习问答》 中国言实出版社 本书编写组 《社会主义意识形态研究》 中山大学出版社 郑永延 叶启绩 郭文亮 等著 《政治观教育通论》 高等教育出版社 教育部社会科学研究与思想政治工作司 组编 《思想道德修养》 中国人民大学出版社 罗国杰 主编 《理想论》 中国青年出版社 彭定光 著 《当代社会问题》 华夏出版社 美国：文森特`帕里罗 等著 《现代资本主义的经济关系和运行特征》 高峰 主编 《互联网对高校师生的影响及对策研究》 中共北京市委教育工作委员会 编 《中国当代大学生价值观研究》 杨德广 晏开利 主编 《转型时代世界体系的发展轨迹 1945——2025》 高等教育出版社 《亚洲四小龙学校德育研究》 顾明远 主编 福建教育出版社 《中国问题报告》 中国社会科学出版社 金鑫 主编 《世界问题报告》 中国社会科学出版社 金鑫 主编 《中国问题》 中国工人出版社 李静 主编 《中国人的徳行》 华龄出版社 秦弓 著 《伦理学引论》 高等教育出版社 章海山 张建如 编著 《伦理学》 高等教育出版社 唐凯麟 编著 《伦理学》 罗国杰 主编 人民出版社（1989年1月第1版） 《伦理学》 唐凯麟 编著 高等教育出版社（2001年8月第1版） 《新闻伦理学简明教程》主编 蓝鸿文 中国人民大学出版社（2001年11月第1版） 《新闻法规与职业道德教程》主编 黄瑚 复旦大学出版社（2003年9月第1版） 《新闻职业道德案例评析》 主编 陈桂兰 高等教育出版社（2001年7月第1版） 《广电职工道德修养读本》 北京广播学院社科学院编 北京广播学院出版社（2003年2月第1版） 《媒体伦理学案例与道德论据》 美国 克利福德等著 华夏出版社（2000年8月第1版）
思想政治教育研究，青少年研究，当代青年，思想理论研究，学校党建与思想教育
国外不用“思想政治教育”这个称谓的，多数以国民教育，精神教育代之。所以外文文献直接查“网络思想政治教育”是查不到的。国外的经验你看以参看《当代国外思想政治教育比较》一书。
找了两篇文章供你参考Morality in EducationMore than ever, opportunities should be afforded to families that wish to bring their children up with a moral education in accordance with their A system of choice allows parents to choose schools that inject moral or religious themes into their children’s Further Reading:“Faith Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?” by Marvin Olasky “Can Public Schools Teach Character?” by D Perry Glanzer “Leading Children Beyond Good & Evil” by D James Davison Hunter An Education for a Good Life by Clark Durant FEATURED ARTICLE:“The Myth of a Value-Free Education”by D Ronald NashAmericans love By "myth," I do not mean the old-fashioned myths that my generation read in grade Many Americans would find reading at that fifth-grade level too difficult these What I mean by "myth" is what older generations used to call a One of the more influential myths presently affecting the American family is the myth of a value-free A value-free education is described as one in which students are supposed to be free from any coerced exposure to the values of One way the defenders of value-free education frame their argument is this: they argue that because America ceased to be a homogeneous society a long time ago, the watchword today must be In the new setting of today, they insist, we can no longer stress the values and beliefs of some, while ignoring the values of And so, they say, we’ll avoid all the problems inherent in this situation by simply agreeing to ignore all This specious argument deceives Americans into thinking this is the only way to achieve fairness in our College students today are surrounded by an allegedly academic setting in which the things they find most obvious are confusion, conflicting claims and the absence of any fixed points of America’s colleges have become centers of intellectual As David Gress explains, "Instead of being havens of independent thought, universities have become channels of indoctrination…confirming the prejudices of those who control the agenda of public " Ralph Bennett is surely right when he warns that "behind its ivy-colored camouflage, American higher education is a fraud—untrue to its students, untrue to " The inadequacies of contemporary education are not exclusively matters of the Traditional religious and moral values are under assault at every level of public and higher Our educational system is engaged in a systematic undermining of these Our educational crisis is to some extent a closing of the American mind, as Allan Bloom examined in his best selling book of that But it is also something more profound, a closing of the American No real progress towards improving American education can occur until all of us realize that an education that ignores moral and religious beliefs cannot qualify as a quality Recently, no less a person than Mikhail Gorbachev admitted that the major reason his nation is in such trouble is because his people are ignorant of moral and spiritual The development of the intellect and of moral character are intimately Just as there is an order in nature (the laws of science), in reason (the laws of logic), and in the realm of numbers, so too is there a moral One thing we need to do is recover the belief that there is a transcendent, unchanging moral order, and restore it once more to a central place in the educational Throughout history, important thinkers have contended that there is a higher order of permanent things (like moral norms), that human happiness is dependent on living our lives in accordance with this transcendent order, and that peace and order within human society require respect for this The most important task of education is to continually remind students of the existence and importance of this transcendent order as well as of its If teachers are doing their job properly, they serve as an essential link in the chain of Without this link, the chain cannot Teachers are the conservers of culture; they are also its At least, that’s the role that teachers used to Modern education in America has largely separated virtue and The Sophists of our age have severed the link between reason and virtue, between the mind and the heart; there is objective truth out there, which it is our duty to pursue and But there is also an objective moral order out there, as well as in An adequate education dare not ignore either the mind or the Just as we dare not divorce education from matters of the heart, so too we must not separate education from Like any important human activity, education has an inescapable religious Religious faith is not just one isolated compartment of a person’s life—a compartment that we can take or leave as we Religious faith is rather a dimension of life that colors, affects and influences everything we do and Human beings are incurably religious, as John Calvin once Paul Tillich was right when he defined religion as a matter of "ultimate " Every person has something that concerns him ultimately and whatever that may be, the ultimate concern will have an enormous influence on everything else the person does or Since every human being has something about which he is ultimately concerned, it follows that every human being has a G No human being can possibly be neutral when it comes to When an individual encounters people who claim that education should be free of any religious content, he should recognize that this is not a religiously neutral Rather it is an assertion that reflects the religious commitments of the person making There is a sense in which education is an activity that is religious at its Any effort to remove religion from education is merely the substitution of one set of ultimate religious commitments for It is absurd then to think that a choice between the sacred and secular in education is Whatever the state and the courts do regarding education will only establish one person’s set of ultimate (religious) concerns at the expense of someone else’ Nothing will remedy the problems of American education more quickly and more effectively than the introduction of greater freedom and choice in We should seek a permanent end to the situation that allows the state to determine where children must attend school, if that child is to receive a free public American families should have complete freedom to send their children to any school they wish, without the added financial burden of paying private school One way to realize this objective is through educational Following the institution of a voucher system, public monies for education would not pass directly to Rather, that money would be given first to the families of school-age children in the form of Parents would then use those vouchers to pay for their children’s education at a school of their own Perhaps the major reason why public schools are so bad is because they have no competition; they are immune to market- Consequently, public schools have no incentive to offer a better product at a lower A pro-choice movement in education would give public schools serious competition for the first time in more than a (Notice the implication here: many Americans are unaware of the fact that for generations, America’s public schools did not enjoy a monopoly with regard to public financial ) It is not enough that we simply increase choice among public The governmental monopoly over publicly funded education is a large part of our It is imperative that educational choice be expanded to include the option of attending without financial penalty, without the burden of double taxation, any school that any family wishes, including church-operated private The best and quickest way to improve the quality of education is to allow families to choose their school and let the competition of the market determine which schools prosper and which schools In the process, families will be able to select schools, not only on the basis of academic quality, but also with a view to the moral and spiritual values fostered by the D Ronald Nash is Professor of Theology and Philosophy at Reformed Theological Seminary Exchange Quarterly Spring 2004 Volume 8, Issue 1Moral Values for Public EducationDaniel C Elliott, ED Azusa Pacific UniversityABSTRACTThe continuing degeneration of personal virtue among the world's societies seems to be emerging as the single-most urgent issue of our Until recent years, public schools had long since deferred from their original roles in morality and character education, though many outside of the school systems continued political pressure to move schools either toward or away from a values-oriented This author analyses this history and poses questions and ideas about the appropriate teaching of the difference between right and wrong in American The continuing degeneration of personal virtue among the world's societies seems to be emerging as the single-most urgent issue of our The 1970’s brought a revisitation of ‘values” but under a personalistic approach called “Values C” Values were to be presented in a neutral way to students who were to clarify and select their There were no incorrect choices, except those for which the individual failed to formulate a supporting The 1980’s and 90’s saw a rapidly intensifying pluralistic view of American When the question of values came up, people asked, “Whose values should we teach?” Many in North American society believe in a core set of virtues found most commonly in a Christian worldview or a Judeo-Christian philosophy, even many who would not characterize themselves as particularly “” Yet the personalistic approach to identification of “virtue“ failed to bring about a more moral society but has, instead, resulted in moral Public schools had long since deferred from their original roles in morality and character education and even many churches or religious organizations were not picking up the slack (Meade, 1990A Major Study on the Morals and Ethics of ChildrenIn March 1990, Robert Coles, a child psychiatrist and Harvard professor, one who called himself “a member of the liberal intellectual left”, was quoted as wistfully recalling “the good old days when religion was taught in the schools” (Meade, 1990) Coles sensed a void--something missing from American homes and schools-- missing for Coles directed a major research The missing element was, they concluded, a strong, unarguable notion of right and wrong, good and Coles’ findings revealed a nation of children who have a complicated belief system that usually runs counter to traditional “There was an unmistakable erosion of children’s faith in, and support for, traditional sources of ” More than parents, teachers or authoritative officials, children turned to peers for guidance on matters of right and Coles described conversations with many kids whose consciences he said were “not all that ” (Meade, 1990)The New Character EducationA new ground swell is observed forming in the 1990’s seeking to restore ethics, morality, and virtue to a central focus in public More than 30 educational leaders from state school boards, teachers' unions, universities, ethics centers, youth organizations, and religious groups met in 1992 at the Josephson Institute of E They formulated eight principles for character education— The Aspen Declaration on Character E (Lickona, 1993) In March of 1993, a national coalition for character development formed with representatives from business, government, and education, as well as They began to formulate an agenda for reinstituting morality in public school curriculum and (Haynes 1994)Four Reasons for Character EducationYoung people increasingly hurt themselves and others because they lack awareness of moral Effective character education improves student behavior, makes schools more civil communities, and leads to improved academic Many students come to school with little moral teaching from their parents, communities or religious We know today that the inclusion of character development emphases within the curriculum of our schools will do the Add Meaning to Education Moral questions are among the great questions facing the individual person and the human There is no such thing as a value-free Schools teach values every day by design or Sustain and Strengthen our Culture Transmitting moral values to the next generation has always been one of the more important functions of a Democracies have a special need for moral education, because democracy is government of and by the people Model Civility There is broad based and growing support for character education in the Common ground exists on core moral values although there may be significant disagreement on the applicationof some of these values to certain controversial issues (Nyland and MacDonald, 1997) The Boyer Institute has been actively promoting research that reveals North American core values (or “common virtu,” also referred to as “common ” Honesty, responsibility, self-discipline, giving, compassion, perseverance, and loving are virtue terms most often However, in application, “honesty” can be applied differently according to other elements of the actor’s worldview or Compassion and/or responsibility might look different among the sub-groups citing these Build True CharacterThus, a person of true character, according to experts, is trustworthy, treats all people with respect, acts responsibly, maintains self-control, is fair and just, is caring, pursues excellence, and is an all around desirable A State Education Code Basis for Teaching Fundamental Moral ValuesThough often humorously critiqued as a state that is less than ‘virtuous’ in its social ethic, nevertheless, California, as a state, has raised the bar for public schools and virtue-based curriculum for several Ever since the 1970s the California legislature has aggressively addressed the question of values and virtue in the curriculum, though this often went unnoticed or unheralded by the media or even the schools Currently, California E Code 44806 tells us that it is the duty of teachers to “impress upon the minds of pupils the principles of morality, truth, justice, patriotism, and a true comprehension of rights, duties, and dignity of American ” The code further directs us to teach students to avoid idleness, profanity, and falsehood, and to instruct them in the manners and morals and the principles of a free Each teacher shall endeavor to impress upon the minds of the pupils the principles of morality, truth, justice, patriotism, a true comprehension of the rights, duties and dignity of American citizenship, including: kindness toward domestic pets and the humane treatment of living In Moral and Civic Education and Teaching About Religion, the Board directs school personnel to teach students about: morality, including respect for differences and the significance of religion; truth; open discussion; justice; patriotism; self-esteem; integrity; empathy, including the “golden rule” (The Christian Bible, Matthew 7:12); exemplary conduct; moral interaction and ethical reflection; and the capacity to recognize values, including respect for the family, property, reliability, and for MoralityThe California Board of Education says, “School personnel must foster in students an understanding of the moral values that form the foundation of American ” California teachers must teach students that citizens in a free society respect the worth and dignity of others, as well as their freedom of Religion is to be presented and viewed as primary source for the presence of basic moral While no individual religious system may be prescribed, school faculty must help students recognize the sources of morality in history, law, and experience and must help students appreciate the significant contributions of religion, including the sacredness of human life and belief in freedom of Morality is defined as “responsibility for personal decisions and conduct and the obligation to demonstrate concern about the well-being of others, along with showing respect for living creatures and the physical ” TruthCalifornia teachers are required to help students understand truth and the necessity for truth in a free and democratic Telling and expecting to be told the truth is an essential element among free and democratic Imagine a word study on the concept of truth, drawn from the Bible and other texts, obtaining definitions of truth JusticeJustice is defined as “fairness in dealing with others, and is considered a hallmark of American ” The California Board of Education said that “one owes to oneself and to others the obligation to engage in a constant effort to see that justice is ” PatriotismJesus, quoted in Matthew 22:21, (The Christian Bible) instructs people to give to the government that which it was due (give to Caesar that which is Caesar') and to reflect similar obedience in relationship to G Loyalty to one’s government is taught throughout Judeo Christian thought and scriptures, being only excepted by loyalty to G In the case of our nation, we pledge to it as “one nation under God” Such a concept bears full discussion in our classrooms, though such discussions must be sensitive and appropriate for the age and maturation levels of the students Self-esteemThe California Board of Education says that “Self-esteem and esteem for others are based on the intrinsic worth and dignity of individuals, not on academic ability or physical Jesus said that we must love others as we love ourselves (Matthew 19:19 ff), that normal human beings do esteem themselves, love themselves, provide for their own basic needs by It is with God’s permission that we do This discussion is authorized in California IntegrityThe California Board of Education tells us “School personnel should encourage students to live and speak with integrity; that is, to be To foster integrity is to help build character, to assist students to be honest with themselves, to promote a wholeness unimpaired by self-deceit, and to encourage the development of reliability in relations with ” In view of recent questions about the integrity among business and government leaders, may would suggest that there is a curriculum related rationale for teachers
你好，我上个月刚发表了一篇论文在《中国科教创新导刊》，发表论文不能着急，首先要看你单位有什么要求，每个单位要求不一样，别发表完了，单位不承认，那才窝火，选择期刊的时候，一定要确定是双刊号齐全，而且在国务院新闻出版总署和知网能查询到的期刊，根据新闻出版总署工作人员的答复：“凡在新闻出版总署期刊检索窗口中检索不到的期刊就是非法期刊。”发表的时候要选择正规的地方。省级刊物：主管单位是省级，比如卫生厅，教育厅，等等。发表的刊物有《新课程》《吉林教育》《海外英语》等。国家级刊物：主管单位是部级得刊物，比如：卫生部，教育部。发表的期刊有：《中国科教创新导刊》，《新课程研究》等。核心期刊：分为北大核心和南大核心，北大核心：北京大学图书馆每4年评定一次的中文核心期刊，进入其目录的刊3、物，无论主管单位是什么级别，均为核心期刊，如:《教学与管理》《职教论坛》《成人教育》等。以上刊物都是双刊号齐全，在新闻出版总署有备案的期刊，但是还要找一个正规的论文发表途径，我上次是在道恒论文网发表的，百度一下就是，魏老师很负责，印象还不错，当然去不去还是取决于你，我只是推荐。最后祝你发表成功！
三年重评一次。从第九版2021-2023目录里摘一部分吧教育研究北京大学教育评论清华大学教育研究全球教育展望教育发展研究教师教育研究比较教育研究教育与经济教育学报外国教育研究现代教育管理教育科学中国教育学刊教育学术月刊教育理论与实践苏州大学学报教育科学版当代教育论坛思想理论教育当代教育科学学校党建与思想教育课程·教材·教法教育研究与实验教育科学研究上海教育科研基础教育中小学管理中国考试人民教育思想政治课教学中学语文教学语文建设中小学英语教学与研究历史教学中学地理教学参考数学教育学报数学通报物理教师物理教学高等教育研究中国高教研究高等工程教育研究复旦教育论坛高校教育管理中国高等教育现代大学教育江苏高教重庆高教研究学位与研究生教育中国大学教学高教探索思想教育研究大学教育科学研究生教育研究黑龙江高教研究思想政治教育研究高教发展与评估分割线------------------------下边这几个是特别推荐、相对容易的：教育理论与实践思想政治课教学中国教育学刊高教探索教育发展研究中国高等教育几率高。
似乎不少，。
《陕西教育（思政版）》 湖北社会科学（思政） 学校党建与思想教育 都是正规学术期刊
两方面一方面偏重思想政治教育理论，以思政原理为主一方面偏重思想政治教育应用，以实际应用中的经验，方法，手段为主。
想一个切入点很小的题目，开题比较容易过关
学术堂整理了十五个思政专业毕业论文题目供大家进行参考： 高校毕业论文工作的改革探索——以中国青年政治学院本科毕业论文为例 未就业毕业大学生群体思想政治状况分析与教育路向探析 毕业仪式的缺失对大学生思想政治教育的影响 提高本科毕业论文质量之我见——以广西师范学院思想政治教育专业为例 坚定理想信念 培养高尚品格——在中国青年政治学院2008年毕业典礼上的讲话 高校毕业分配中的思想政治工作 关于做好学员毕业阶段思想政治工作的几点思考 高中政治毕业会考与高考的教学衔接及导向问题 思想政治教育类专业毕业论文的问题与对策 浅谈对毕业大学生思想政治工作的预见性 对军校毕业学员思想政治状况的调查与思考 以学生为本 开展毕业实习阶段的思想政治工作 政治演讲中人际意义的身份建构功能分析——以奥巴马在美国海军学院2013届毕业生毕业典礼上的演讲为例 高校毕业典礼的思想政治教育价值——以兰州大学为例 英语专业学生的政治认知及其思想工作——以英语专业学生毕业论文为例
——警惕全球变暖 最近这几年，大家觉得天气一下子就变热了，原本凉爽的秋天现在几乎要到10月下旬才开始，8月份最热的天居然达到了40度以上。这是为什么呢？原来，是人类自己惹的祸。 随着人类高科技发展进程越来越快，科学随之产生的副作用逐渐体现出来，全球变暖就是一个例子。天气炎热，在酷暑里泡空调成为了一项新的“业余爱好”，但人们可曾想过，空调会带来什么负面影响呢？答案当然是肯定的，空调排放的气体中含有大量的甲烷，输送到外面，甲烷也是导致全球变暖的气体。同时，空调还会浪费掉许多电，所以要尽量避免用空调，适当即可。 而另一个原因就是：二氧化碳！汽车尾气与工厂废气中含有大量二氧化碳，而二氧化碳最可能导致温室效应（即全球变暖）现在汽车逐渐增多，据有关方面统计，到21世纪，汽车在全世界已有7亿辆，大量的尾气严重影响着我们，咳嗽，喉咙发炎……最重要的是全球变暖。有人统计，美国人均二氧化碳排放量已达到了20吨一年！中国每年的二氧化碳排放量人均排放量也有51吨一年！我们周围的环境在恶劣地变化。 更重要的原因就是：森林锐减，水资源破坏，生态链严重被破坏，大量土地贫瘠，水污染严重，据统计全世界10%的河水被污染，新鲜的淡水供应成了问题，同时由于矿物质被大量使用，燃烧出的CO2气体导致了大气污染，同时臭氧层被严重破环，南北极出现臭氧层洞，加剧了环境的恶化。这样恶性循环的话，最终会导致人们的生活被严重影响。 这样一来的悲剧是什么呢？当然是显而易见了！天气加热，海平面上涨，南北极冰川融化，海滨城市，岛国被淹。这一切，都严重影响了人类的生存，实验证明，以后300年，海平面将上涨半米多，这还是最乐观的数据。再过7年，全球变暖将会无可逆转地持续。更可怕的是，由于北极冰融化，降雨量加强，大量淡水汇入北大西洋，破坏了墨西哥暖流，一旦墨西哥暖流被切断后，欧洲西北部温度将会下降5—8度之多，从而造成的影响，很可能引发新的冰河时期！想必大家一定看过《后天》这部电影，剧中的情景正是几百年后对我们地球的一个真实写照：龙卷风，冰层断裂，温度急剧下降，冰风暴，冻雨，地震，洪水，海啸……这并不是疯狂的幻想，如果人类不停止毁坏环境的话，这将成为现实！全球变暖不仅仅是天气变热，更会牵连出许多负面影响！ 为了拯救地球，我们应该尽量做到：不开空调，使用回收环保纸张，舍弃肉类（牛排）食品（牛消化中含有一氧化二氮，如果你转为素食主义者，每年二氧化碳的排放量将减少5吨！）不用塑料袋，乘公交车……生活中的点点滴滴。其实环保并不难，只要你支持环保，就是你给这个星球的最好礼物，不需要太多言辞，只要每个人都行动起来，就会是一股强大的力量！如今，日本，英国，美国等国家纷纷行动起来，我们虽然也采取了行动，但，对于一个有13亿人口的泱泱大国，这一点，还是不够的。所以，警惕全球变暖，是全人类为了挽救地球的唯一方法，有人也许会说：我们不是可以移居到别的星球上去吗？答案虽是肯定的，但那又能容纳多少人呢？有人说：治理温室效应的资金太大了，对金融来说是天价。但，如果一直拖延，最终的结果，是我们的地球面目全非，别说金融，就连自己的生命也难保啊！所以环境保护不应只停留在口头上，而要真正付之与行动了。 回答者： 阿
每一门学科都有自己特定的研究对象,确立研究对象是一个学科成立的根据和发展的逻辑起点。然而,思想政治教育学从诞生的那一天起,人们对这门学科的研究对象就一直存在争论,形成了各种各样的观点。本文就思想政治教育学的研究对象作一些文献综述,以供同仁进一步研究。 一、起步阶段(20世纪80年代初中期): 着眼于为日常思想政治工作服务的应用研究 对思想政治教育学研究对象的探讨起步于20世纪80年代初中期。正如左鹏所说:“虽然思想政治教育作为人类社会阶级斗争和社会实践的重要活动内容已有几千年的历史了,虽然我们党在长期的革命和建设实践中积累了十分宝贵而丰富的思想政治教育经验,但把思想政治教育作为一门科学来研究,明确提出思想政治教育学的概念则是十一届三中全会以后的事。”1980年,为了适应新时期思想政治工作的需要,党的理论工作者根据无产阶级革命导师关于“宣传工作”、“政治工作”、“政治教育工作”、“思想工作”、“思想政治工作”的一系列论述和我党几十年思想政治工作的实际经验,首次提出“思想政治工作科学化”和“思想政治工作是一门科学”这两个概念,并在报刊和学术会议上进行讨论